Doesn't NETVIEW run multiple users in the same address space? Can you write NETVIEW scripts in anything other than CLIST and REXX?
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [0000042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 10:58 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Re; Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:31:37 +0000, Jack Zukt wrote: > >The glitch was the NETVIEW REXXSTRF value thas was set to the default >DISABLE. While we wait for an IPL, the OVERRIDE solves the issue. > Please describe OVERRIDE. Is that a parameter to NETVIEW? Star Trek trope: "Computer, access data base." "Access denied." "Override!" "Access granted." ... makes sense if "Override" is the root password. I'm puzzled. If the objective of DISABLE is to prevent access to sensitive data, wouldn't storage keys and segment protection be sufficient and necessary? REXXSTRF would seem to restrict only REXX, not other programming languages. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
