By Alexandra Kurland:

I'm just back from the Cleveland Clicker Expo, and my head feels  
stuffed to the rafters.  You'd think after six or seven Expos, some  
of the lectures would start to sound stale, but not so.  It doesn't  
matter how many times I hear the lectures on clicker basics, there is  
always a new twist, a new angle that emerges.

The "ah has" from the Expo are too many to list, but I will share  
some highlights.  On Monday after the Expo we had a Faculty meeting  
to discuss plans for next year.  The meeting is something we all look  
forward to because Ken Ramirez generally brings video clips of his  
current training projects.  Ken is the Director of Training at the  
Shedd Aquarium in Chicago so he's always got something fun he's  
working on.  This year's video highlights included some work he's  
been doing with beluga whales at an Aquarium in Japan.

Belugas apparently blow air rings the way some smokers blow smoke  
rings.  The behavior is not well understood and there is no clear  
predictor of when it will occur.  You could watch for days and never  
see the bubble rings, but by chance a Japanese film crew happened to  
be on hand at one point when the whales were blowing bubbles.  They  
got some beautiful photos of the rings.  The zoo started using the  
images in their advertising, but then of course the public wanted to  
see the whales blowing rings.  So the zoo needed to get the behavior  
on cue.

The whales were in tanks with glass side walls so people could watch  
them swimming under water.  The trainers wanted to be able to cue the  
whales to blow air rings at the audience.  The problem was they  
didn't know how to get the behavior in the first place.  They  
couldn't rely on capturing the behavior since it occurred so  
irregularly.   So getting bubble rings on cue was the training  
problem the zoo asked Ken to help them solve.

Ken's solution illustrated everything I love about clicker training -  
the weaving together of a solid understanding of the science of  
clicker training with good training technique and creativity. He  
started with a behavior the whales had solidly on cue - spitting  
water.  They would come up to the edge of the tank and on cue spit  
water at the trainers.

So Ken started by asking the whales to spit water while they were  
under water.  The whales readily transferred the behavior.  The  
movement of their lips for spitting was similar to that of the air  
blowing behavior, but spitting water under water didn't create the  
same charming visual effect.  It was however a good beginning.  The  
next challenge was getting them to spit air.

When the whales blew air rings on their own, they would first swim up  
to the surface and get a mouthful of air.  So the next task was to  
get the whales to hold air in their mouths.  This was the truly  
ingenious part.  Ken used his own respirator.  He cued the whales to  
open their mouths and then inserted his respirator so they got a big  
gulp of air.  The whales seemed perfectly comfortable with this and  
held the air obligingly in their mouths.

So the next step was to give the "spit water" cue and see what  
happened.  Ken gave the cue, and the whales responded by blowing an  
air ring.  It wasn't a very good air ring, but the whale was  
definitely spitting out his air bubble.

To get a better formed ring, the trainers had to get better in their  
timing. The trainers Ken was working with tended to click too late.   
They were clicking when they could see the finished air ring, but  
that's not the information that was most important to the whales.   
They really needed to be bridged just as they were forming the bubble  
ring.  So, Ken started looking at shaping micro movements.  He said  
he got the idea for the solution in part from presentations he'd seen  
at the Expo.  Kay Lawrence's discussions about shaping micro- 
movements in dogs got him thinking about doing something similar with  
the whales.

To learn what the trainers needed to click, Ken had them study video  
of the whales blowing bubble rings. He slowed the video way down so  
they could see frame by frame what the whales were doing.  Ken had  
all the trainers watch the video over and over again until they could  
recognize the changes and begin to see and respond to them in real  
time.  When he first showed us video of the whales blowing bubble  
rings, it was hard to see what they were doing, but slowed down it  
became very clear.  You could see the whale form a round circle with  
its lips, then pull them in and at the same time the shape of its  
mellon (it's forehead) distorted.  It creased in and a micro second  
later, the whale produced the bubble ring.  It floated through the  
water, a beautifully formed ring of bubbles, as if the whale were  
blowing kisses at the camera.

At this point Ken could reliably cue the whales to blow bubble rings,  
but he was still supplying the air.  The next step was to have the  
whales get their own air.  As a preparation for that he had the  
aquarium's trainers include bubble blowing in the whales daily  
training sessions.  When he returned a couple of weeks later, the  
whales had become practiced bubble ring blowers.  So Ken did a  
session with them where he gave the cue to blow a ring, but did not  
first give the whales any air.  The first whale spit water, but Ken  
did not bridge and reinforce him.  Instead he cued him again.  The  
whale hesitated, then went up to the surface, got his own mouthful of  
air, came down and very deliberately blew it straight at Ken.  Success.

Ken showed some enchanting video of the whales engaging with the  
spectators.  They blew their bubble rings straight at the people so  
they floated towards them before bursting against the glass.  The  
rings looked like fairy rings floating in the water.  The whales  
began adding their own flourishes to the behavior, including blowing  
bubble rings out their air holes!  They would also blow a ring and  
then do a back flip so they could "catch" the ring with their tail.   
It was pure delight watching them.

The Horse Connection
So why am I sharing this whale story on a horse list?  Apart from the  
fact that it was just so enchanting, it was a wonderful illustration  
both of the creativity that is so much a part of clicker training,  
and of the value of micro-shaping.  The analysis of the whale's  
movement using slow motion video is something we should all be taking  
note of.

Once you get past the basic lessons where it is easy to see what your  
horse is doing, seeing detail matters.  As clicker trainers we like  
to think of ourselves as positive trainers.  We click and reinforce  
the behavior we want.  We understand that the opposite of positive  
reinforcement  is no reinforcement.  It is not correction.  But are  
we really giving our horse a truly positive training experience just  
because we are using positive reinforcement?

Ken gave a presentation on advanced training concepts.  He prefaced  
his talk by defining what he meant by a beginner and an advanced  
trainer.  A beginner clicker trainer reinforces desired behavior and  
ignores unwanted behavior.  It's that simple.  If a novice trainer  
needs a more advanced tool, Ken said he shouldn't be working with  
that particular animal.  He was speaking as the director of training  
of a major Aquarium where he routinely has seventy odd trainers on  
his staff. Part of his job involves teaching new trainers how to work  
with what are potentially very dangerous animals.

We are also working with what are potentially very dangerous animals  
even though we are working with a domestic species.  Just as they do  
with zoo animals, I recommend that horse owners begin with protected  
contact.  This gives a novice clicker trainer the breathing room she  
needs to reinforce her horse for touching targets, putting his ears  
forward, backing up, etc., while at the same time remaining non- 
reactive to unwanted behavior.  Learning how not to react to things  
you don't like can be a hard skill to learn, especially if your horse  
is presenting dangerous, unacceptable behavior. Protective contact  
helps.  It lets you get your "sea legs" while you are learning the  
skills needed to be an effective clicker trainer.

That's all well and good, but its the second part of Ken's statement  
that can get a lot trickier.  Its easy to say that a novice handler  
shouldn't be working in a situation that requires advanced tools.   
The reality is horse owners are frequently working with horses that  
are not well matched to their experience level.  That means the  
foundation work is all the more important.  Protective contact is a  
wonderful thing.  While you are developing your motor skills,  
perfecting your timing,  and learning the basic concepts that go  
along with clicker training, it makes sense to keep things simple.   
That means focusing on the foundation lessons.  The more solid you  
become with the basics, the less frustration you and your horse will  
encounter later.

Positive Trainers
We are clicker trainers.  We want to be positive with our horses, but  
we need to separate out intent from tools.  If you are a lumper, if  
you are raising your criteria too fast, if you are inconsistent in  
your timing, if you do not reinforce after every click, you can  
easily end up with a very frustrated learner.  You need to look at  
the effect on your learner, not just the tools you are using, to  
decide if the training experience is a positive one.

Jesus Rosales-Ruiz showed a wonderful example of this.  One of his  
students was looking at the difference in response between following  
every click with reinforcement versus not reinforcing after every  
click.  In the video clips he showed where the dog was being treated  
after every click, the dog responded promptly to the cues.   He was  
animated. His tail was wagging.

When the same dog was clicked but treated after only fifty percent of  
the clicks, his body language changed dramatically.  The tail stopped  
wagging.  The handler had to repeat cues, and in one very dramatic  
clip, the dog gave the handler a "time out". He left the training  
area completely.

Jesus said that the dogs in the study belonged to a friend of the  
student.  Normally when she went over to visit, they greeted her  
enthusiastically, but after she did the experiment where she clicked  
but did not treat, the dogs left the room when she came into the  
house.   The experiment didn't just suppress behavior during the  
trial.  It had a global impact on the relationship.

The Gorilla in the Room
Kathy Sdao shared with us some video clips produced by researchers  
who study visual cognition.  I almost hate to describe one of the  
clips she showed.  Once you know what to look for, the clip doesn't  
have the same impact.  But it is so relevant to this topic I have to  
describe it.  The clip shows a group of people passing basketballs  
back and forth.  Half the group were wearing white jerseys.  The  
other half were wearing black.  Kathy instructed us to count the  
number of times the ball left the hands of someone wearing a white  
jersey.

Everyone watched and counted.  At the end of the twenty second clip  
she asked for numbers. Fifteen, sixteen, nineteen.  One very  
observant person called out fifteen straight passes, plus four that  
bounced.  That's showing off - or would be except for the one thing  
that very focused and observant individual didn't see - and that was  
the person in the gorilla suit who mid way through the clip walked  
across the basketball court.  No one in the room who hadn't heard  
about the clip before hand saw the gorilla in the room.

That's totally normal.  Our brains filter out an enormous amount.  We  
see what we are focused on, what we are directed to see, what we want  
to see.

Think about all the ways this is significant for our horses, our  
dogs, our family members, our work.

A trainer focuses our attention on one aspect of the training, and we  
fail to see the problems emerging in different areas.

Our horse fails to see the cues we are giving just as the people  
watching that video failed to see the gorilla in the room.  We think  
the animal is being deliberately disobedient, when really it is just  
a problem in perception.

We're training one criterion, and we get so focused on that that we  
fail to see some other elements that are falling apart and need our  
attention.

I'm sure you can find many other ways in which this video clip  
relates to your horse.   For me one of the most important is this: we  
want to think of ourselves as all positive trainers so we miss the  
signs of stress when we are lumping our criteria and making the  
lesson too hard for our learner.

Micro-Shaping and Positive Training
I wasn't able to get to Kay Lawrence's presentation on micro-shaping  
at this Expo, but I saw it last time and I had many conversations  
with her through the course of this weekend.  I wish everyone could  
see the video she shows in her talk of the dog she is shaping to put  
his foot on a stool.  In the first clip she deliberately lumps  
criteria.  She clicks the dog for putting his foot on the stool, but  
she does not click for micro movements.  Over a sixty second trial  
the rate of reinforcement in the dog is very low.  He offers a few  
paw touches, but he is not very focused on the task and shows signs  
of stress.

In the next clip Kay micro-shapes.  She clicks for any lift of the  
front paw.  It doesn't have to be oriented to the stool.  Even a  
slight lift of the paw earns a click and a treat.  Over sixty seconds  
the rate of reinforcement goes way up as does the dog's focus and  
enthusiasm.

So how do you learn to see the tiny shifts in balance that present  
clickable moments?  Ken's presentation on the beluga whale showed us  
one way.  You video tape your animal and slow down the motion until  
you can see all the tiny weight shifts that create the overall  
movement.  You learn to spot the movement that occurs just before the  
clickable moment so you are ready to click.

Okay, so you can see the weight shifts, but that doesn't mean you'll  
be able to click them in real time.  How do you sharpen your  
mechanical skills so you are clicking on time?  Theresa McKeon in her  
presentations on Tagteaching gave people some great exercises for  
sharpening their timing.  She had people click when she opened her  
hand.  She started out slowly, predictably so most people were  
successful, then she got faster and trickier.  Sometimes she held up  
all five fingers.  Sometimes only one or two fingers.  Sometimes she  
started to open her clenched fist, but didn't.  The number of missed  
clicks increased with the difficulty level.  It's a great game to  
play with a friend.

So here's the question: how good is your timing?

Can you have a friend bounce a ball and click each time the ball hits  
the ground?  Other timing games she suggested were watching  
television commercials and clicking each time there is a scene change.

I hadn't intended when I started this post to give you an Expo  
Highlights report.  I really just wanted to share Ken's work with the  
belugas, but everything truly is everything else.  And it ties in so  
well with something I've been thinking about a lot lately which is  
this phrase "all positive trainer".

When people describe themselves as clicker trainers, they often say  
they are all positive.  But what does this really mean?  And is it  
possible?  If you are shaping and your animal is getting frustrated  
because you are lumping too many criteria together so the rate of  
reinforcement is low, are you being all positive? You are clicking  
and reinforcing correct responses, but your animal is not having a  
positive experience.

When you add in some clues in the form of negative reinforcement, are  
you no longer being all positive even though your animal is now more  
successful and is clearly happier?

I want my horses to have a positive learning experience.  To that end  
I mark behavior with a click and a treat.  But to judge if my horse  
is having a positive experience I must look not just at what quadrant  
of operant conditioning I am using, but at the experience my horse is  
having.  I can be using what I would consider to be all positive  
methods, but if I am lumping criteria, or neglecting to reinforce  
after I click, my horse may be having anything but a pleasant  
experience.

When you are defining yourself as a positive trainer you must look at  
a broader picture than just your immediate training plan.  What is  
your intent, your underlying belief system about training and the  
animals you work with? What tools, concepts and strategies do you use  
in your training? What tools, strategies and concepts do you avoid?   
What is the effect of your training on the learner?  How good are  
your mechanical skills?  Are you experienced enough to be working  
with this animal on this lesson - or should you be working on  
something simpler?

If you are clicking and treating but your horse is showing the kind  
of diminished response that Jesus saw in his study on treatless  
clicks, does that mean that clicker training doesn't work or that you  
need some other tool?   Does that mean its okay to correct your horse  
for unwanted behavior?   No.  It may simply mean you need to go back  
a few steps and work on something easier for both you and your  
horse.  There is always a smaller, simpler, easier step you can go  
back to.

Clicker trainers focus on what they want, and they remain non- 
reactive to unwanted behavior.  But this doesn't mean they don't see  
the "gorilla in the room".  They see the unwanted behavior, but they  
manage their horse and the environment so that their attention  
remains focused on marking and reinforcing desired behavior.  If you  
are new to clicker training I would urge you to be on the lookout for  
the "gorillas in the room".  That means paying attention to what your  
horse is telling you about his comfort level.  If he is getting  
frustrated, take a step back and evaluate your training.  Are you  
asking for too much too fast?  Are you inadvertently punishing  
behavior because your timing is off and you are raising your criteria  
too fast?

Helix Fairweather gave a great presentation on keeping records.   
Finding some way of charting progress, whether it is a journal, or  
the type of record keeping she suggests, can be a huge assist to your  
training.

Throughout the weekend presenters stressed the importance of a good  
foundation. Clicker training is a powerful tool.  Those beluga whales  
blowing bubble rings are proof of that statement. Ken's presentation  
on advanced training concepts showed that clicker training includes a  
rich storehouse of useful problem solving techniques, but at the core  
of them is developing good basic skills.  Whether it is a horse, a  
dog, or even a beluga whale, learning good foundation skills is the  
key to becoming a good solid clicker trainer.  The better you are  
with the basics, the more truly all positive the experience will be  
for your horse.  Add creativity and experience to the mix, and over  
time that's how great clicker trainers emerge.


Alexandra Kurland
theclickercenter.com

Reply via email to