--On Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:09 AM -0700 Mark Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> There seems to be an ambiguity in the grammar regarding: |> |> UIDNEXT |> UIDVALIDITY |> |> Zero is the ambiguity. | | I don't understand what you are saying. Could you please clarify? | Neither UIDNEXT nor UIDVALIDITY can be zero, and the grammar indicates | that by using nz-number instead of number.
Actually the STATUS syntax uses 'number' for all the status responses, including the UIDNEXT and UIDVALIDITY values - i.e. the UIDNEXT and UIDVALIDITY STATUS response could legally be zero. What you probably need to do in the formal syntax is:
status-att-list = status-att-resp *(SP status-att-resp)
status-att-resp = status-att-z SP number / status-att-nz SP nz-number
status-att-z = "MESSAGES" / "RECENT" / "UNSEEN"
status-att-nz = "UIDNEXT" / "UIDVALIDITY"
-- Cyrus Daboo
