Helmut Apfelholz wrote:
>>I've found a way to fix this. In master.c
>>reap_child, add:
>>
>> c->s->ready_workers--;
>>
>>and
>>
>> t->s->ready_workers--;
>>
>>...immediately after the corresponding nactive--.
>>This resolves the
>>problem for me in the limited testing I've done to
>>date.
>>
>>
>I've applied the patch to our server and I must say it
>doesn't work. The master process creates more and more
>processes with this patch.
>
>This is not the right solution to the problem.
>
>
That's correct. We've got a proper fix which I'll be posting in a few hours.
