On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > First, the installation we are planning must support both POP (legacy) > and IMAP. Since the mailboxes will be spread on at least two imapd > backend, we will have a problem presenting a unified POP access. The > obvious solution would be to have different user use different POP server, > depending where their mailbox are located. This is quite inelegant and > would complicate user support. Is there any other way ? One solution I > could envision would be to have a MUPDATE-aware POP proxy. People > connect to the proxy, the proxy resolve the user mailbox location via > MUPDATE and serve the client request from that server. Does such a > thing exist ? Pointer to alternate solution are welcome.
You mean pop3proxyd? That said, be sure you're using the murder for the right reasons. If you don't need a uniform mailbox namespace, you might want to consider perdition (and a similar POP proxy) instead of the Aggregator. -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456 Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper