I've done some testing and seen a HUGE speedup when switching from EXT2/3 to XFS. unfortunantly I haven't had a chance to do the same comparison with Reiserfs (I need to, but haven't had time)

I was even able to see a dramatic difference with a single user accessing a fairly large mailbox (thousands of messages in the inbox)

David Lang

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, John Madden wrote:

Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:12:57 -0500 (EST)
From: John Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: best filesystem for imap server

I dont want to start a religious battle, but could I have some opinions
on filesystems for a 100ish user imap server? I have 2x 250G western
digital disks to use.

I think the performance of those disks (and the RAID you put on them) will be much more significant that the filesystem you use, considering the size of your user population. And given that factor, I'd say that even ext3 won't give you any problems performance-wise. Still, reiserfs, IMO, would be preferable for mail files.

John



--
John Madden
UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech State College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


-- There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- C.A.R. Hoare --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

Reply via email to