> El 9/6/2015, a las 12:48, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <ego...@ramattack.net> escribió: > > Good morning, > > We are running Cyrus 2.3.18 very happily. We have noticed that Cyrus mailbox > partition (and config partition) is starting to pass the 70% of used space. > So we have decided to add a new disk to the server > in order to create a new Cyrus mailbox partition. Later we’ll move some of > the big or some more of the littleler mailboxes to this new mailbox > partition. > > Have been doing some checks and have noticed of two things : > > - The directory of the mailbox in the source partition is not being removed… > it stays totally empty but there… > - In the slave replica (I’m using Cyrus replication) the mailbox is not being > moved automatically from partition one… to partition two.. the mailbox > destination (the new added mailbox partition) > > I wanted to ask, are these two behaviors considered normal? just for knowing > if perhaps the code could be doing something wrong…. And mainly talking about > the second question about the > renm and replication because I’m seeing it does automatically in the slave > relocate the mailbox in the second partition… perhaps this is normal too… but > IIRC Cyrus replication died if there weren’t > the same partitions in the master and the slave…. with the same names… or > does it just do that for being able to do cm commands only??. > > Best regards, > ---- > Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ > List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ > To Unsubscribe: > https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
Anyone who could confirm this :) :) ?? Bron?? :) ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
