On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:12:19 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Indeed, I started by setting them to zero in the caller. Decided that > there was some precedent to use the guard_size as the minimum value for > unused planes (and so perhaps the unused planes on the unused pipes) and > so it was then natural to do it inside g4x_compute_wm. I guess it all > depends on how many FIFOs are split between the pipes. Using guard_size, > I believe, should be safest. guard_size is probably better than random stack stuff. Any opinion on whether this should be done in g4x_update_wm instead of g4x_compute_wm0? -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgp0GEXlB17OK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
