On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:09:16PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > We are seeing CRC check failures in some of the 18bpp video pattern
>> > DP Compliance tests causing the tests to fail. On further investigation, 
>> > it is
>> > rootcaused to dithering that the i915 driver enables in case of 18bpp pipe
>> > configuration that messes up the CRC and causes the test to fail.
>> 
>> The CTS spec actually accounts for CRC failures caused by dithering and
>> color space conversions. See section 3.2.1. However, it would be
>> preferrable to be able to automate this.
>> 
>> > Some of the approaches that can solve this problem are:
>> > 1.  Add a new method in intel_dp.c to request the compliance test state.
>> > Call this new method in intel_display.c to not enable dithering during a
>> > compliance test. Issue with this is it makes the general portion of the 
>> > driver
>> > compliance aware.
>> >
>> > 2.  Move the dithering enable to compute_config methods in all encoder 
>> > source
>> > files. Issue: Lot of duplicate code and DP is the only encoder that uses 
>> > 18bpc.
>> >
>> > 3.  Disable dithering at all times in the driver. However this can cause 
>> > image
>> > quality issue with 8bpc plane and 6 bit pipe.
>> >
>> > Any suggestions on which approach can be implemented in order to pass
>> > compliance?
>> 
>> I can't find any mention in the specs that we couldn't enable/disable
>> dithering on the fly. It's PIPE_MISC for BDW+ and PIPE_CONF for the
>> rest. So I'm wondering about doing...
>> 
>> 4. Disable dithering at intel_dp_sink_crc_start() and enable it again
>>    (according to config->dither) at intel_dp_sink_crc_stop(). It's
>>    similar to the hsw_disable_ips() and hsw_enable_ips() calls, but
>>    would have to cover more platforms.
>> 
>> Ville, thoughts on changing dithering on the fly?
>
> Should be fine I think.
>
> BTW see 
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-December/115186.html
> if you intend to add more crc workaround type of things. There I'm
> changing the IPS w/a to force a full modeset because it was the easiest
> way to do things, and the current thing is just broken.

I think forcing a modeset for sink crc would be rather annoying.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to