On 7/4/2014 8:36 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 03:13:52PM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote:
From: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jin...@intel.com>
Enables 180 degree rotation for sprite and primary planes.
Updated the primary plane rotation support as per the new universal plane
design.
Most of these patches were already reviewed in intel-gfx in February 2014 thats
why there is version history in few of them.
v2: Moved rotation_property to drm_plane. Added updation of FBC when rotation is
again set to 0.
Testcase: kms_rotation_crc
This igt can be extended for clipped rotation cases. Right it only tests 180
degree rotation for sprite and primary plane with crc check.
Sonika Jindal (2):
drm/i915: Add 180 degree primary plane rotation support
drm: Resetting rotation property
Ville Syrjälä (9):
drm: Move DRM_ROTATE bits out of omapdrm into drm_crtc.h
drm: Add support_bits parameter to drm_property_create_bitmask()
drm: Add drm_mode_create_rotation_property()
drm/omap: Switch omapdrm over to drm_mode_create_rotation_property()
drm: Add drm_rect rotation functions
drm: Add drm_rotation_simplify()
drm/i915: Add 180 degree sprite rotation support
drm/i915: Make intel_plane_restore() return an error
drm/i915: Add rotation property for sprites
Missing from this series, your two documentation patches (we need to
bundle things up as a entity that makes sense for one of the maintainers
to pick it up (either Dave or Daniel)).
I was not aware that documentation patches should also be part of this.
Because I was asked to send the igt testcase separately I thought
documentation will also go separately. Documentation patches have also
got reviewed-by tags. What do you suggest? Should I send the patchset
again with documentation? Will Igt still be a separate post?
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
