yes, sorry, i was talking about the given situation. now you can bring in the gpu and shader clock but when you say u increase the performance, you mean system performance, not the performance of the CORE clock of the gpu. Of course (im not using the word obviously here again) there's a range of voltage a certain over/underclocking will work with, so without changeing any Volts you can overclock some. However, this will also lead to more heat. I admit you can improve SYSTEM performance and lower temperature but that is the result of optimizing (mostly software). you can NOT overclock a unit without raising its temperature, even at stock voltages.(if you overclock shader clock then measure its temp, not the core temp)
afterall im not trying to give a lesson to anyone, im just making my point, and trying to help people understand what they are doing. On Apr 19, 12:37 am, tribaljet <roller...@hotmail.com> wrote: > MAD, relax. Things are that obvious. Obviously, it's necessary to be > quite careful. And yes, overclocks can be done without increasing > voltages, but that's not on discussion here. What's being discussed is > that from stock voltages, lowering any value at all will lower temps, > but setting high multiplier values with very low voltages like the > original voltages that Daniel set, is just plain wrong. > > On 18 Abr, 23:35, "Jose Villegas (MADBEAST)" <josepi...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Guys before talking about what you dont know and could be obvious... > > try it. > > > Excuse me mister but not necessarly higher voltage is the only way to > > increase performance. > > > Actually i can overclock a GPU to increase the performance and > > simultaneously DECREASE the temperature, by increasing the frecuency > > rates of shader clock without increasing 0.0000001V ... > > > So its NOT THAT OBVIOUS -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
