While Enix has done ok games in the past, it mostly crippled the creative stream of Squaresoft (now Square), and for that I'll never forgive Enix.
I'm not a particularly big fan of Battlefield games, but I enjoyed 2142 on lan parties quite a bit. Vietnam was only for multiplayer as well. But this certainly makes one wonder about the future of the series, in a good way: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TzDTFNZq0k I belive that EA has been careless as of late, but that doesn't lessen any of the amazing games it launched :) On 22 Abr, 00:03, Abhishek Indoria <indoriaabhis...@gmail.com> wrote: > @tribaljet: I don't like BF:Vietnam because it feels, you know...I don't > know how to describe it, but it doesn't have the finish like BF1942. Sure, > the GI joe soundtrack on startup is nice, but the whole Vietnam theme and > war is not as exciting to play as it sounds. > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Abhishek Indoria <indoriaabhis...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > Nah, Espionage. You know, EA has on track some of the best games in the > > world. It's my third best gaming manufacturer and distributor company after > > SQUARE-ENIX (Final Fantasy, anyone?) and Capcom. > > > Yeah, EA has effed up seriously recently, but that doesn't change that > > there are some excellent games produced by it, either be it FIFA, Dragon > > Age, Spore, MoH or the Sims series. > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:31 AM, tribaljet <roller...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> It used to be true :( > > >> And Battlefield Vietnam is quite good, definitely improves on both the > >> previous game and the one after. Only with 2142 did things get back on > >> track. > > >> Not to mention the most genious horn key placement of all history of > >> games :D > > >> On 21 Abr, 19:09, Espionage724 <espionage...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > I hope "When you hear the name 'EA', you expect some high quality shit > >> :P" > >> > is a joke :p > > >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Abhishek Indoria < > > >> > indoriaabhis...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > BattleField Vietnam is...uh...sluggish. I mean, it's good, but not the > >> kind > >> > > of finished product you'd expect from EA. > >> > > When you hear the name 'EA', you expect some high quality shit :P > > >> > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Espionage724 < > >> espionage...@gmail.com>wrote: > > >> > >> Yep you can stop x64 Windows from forcing signature enforcement by > >> > >> pressing F8 at startup, and selecting the Disable Windows Driver > >> Signature > >> > >> Enforcement (may be named slightly differently, but you'll know what > >> one it > >> > >> is). > > >> > >> You can do the above everytime you restart, or I recommend using: > >> > >>http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo > >> > >> <http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo>Works well on both MBR and > >> UEFI > >> > >> Windowx 64 installations. > > >> > >> Theres another method that I think is easier, but it only works for > >> MBR > >> > >> installs to my knowledge. If you don't know how to install Windows in > >> UEFI, > >> > >> then it's probably MBR :p > > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Jose Villegas (MADBEAST) < > >> > >> josepi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> > >>> yes! > > >> > >>> ask Espionage about a method to get rid of that signatured required > >> by > >> > >>> the system its something from the start after BIOS setup.. its easy > >> > >>> and safe to do > > >> > >>> -- > >> > >>> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> > >> -- > >> > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> > > -- > >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> -- > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
