Hola Folks!
For the past week, I've been plagued by thoughts of gyroscopes and some
interaction of precession to gravity and inertia. For what its worth,
here is where I'm at right now;
in precession,
think of two rings at 90 degree angles to each other, thus one vertical,
one horizontal
a rotating weight spins a geared wheel CCW on a horizontal axis within
the horizontal ring
the horizontal ring has gearteeth to mesh with the rotating weight shaft
gearteeth
as the shaft spins CCW, the gearteeth on the shaft cause the gearteeth
on the horizontal ring to be driven in a CCW direction
inverse to normal logic....the faster the shaft spins, the SLOWER the
toothed horizontal ring moves
the slower the shaft spins, the FASTER the toothed horizontal ring spins
thus, there must be a shaft velocity sufficiently high for the
horizontal ring to STOP MOVEMENT
This equates as a mechanical analogue to PHASE CONJUGATION, where you
combine two waves of identical frequencies but at different phases to
each other.
When the phase of one frequency is 180 degrees out of phase with the
other identical frequency, you produce a standing wave...a scalar
bubble, a stress wave in space....if magnetic, its a cancellation of the
magnetic field leaving A PURE ELECTRIC FIELD, ergo Hoopers Motional field.
The mechanical version is similar to the notion of 'specific speed' as
described for transmutation at;
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/specific.htm
Also for a description of the coriolis force and a graphic animation of
precession, see;
http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/manflight.htm
Now comes the finding of the patent which claims one can actually tap
into the inertial field of the planet using gyroscopes to produce
jerking, pulsing action which can be rendered to produce power;
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5313850.WKU.&OS=PN/5313850&RS=PN/5313850
11/01/05 - Gyroscopic Earth Power Generation
(A few weeks ago I came across a hint of a device claimed to tap
mechanical/inertial energy from a gyroscope aligned with the planet, I
think I finally tracked it down here. There is much magic in this if you
study it. - JWD)
Correlation to Otis Carrs Utron and propulsion claims;
http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/carr3.htm
Theoretically there is an enormous quantity of pure unpolluting energy
available from the energy contained in the rotational inertia of the
earth--enough to supply all the energy and power requirements of the
world's civilization, currently being met by oil production, for the
next 100,000,000 years with only minimal and readily acceptable
reduction in the daily rotation rate of the earth at the end of that
period: approximately 30%, a 34 hour day--at the present rate of oil
energy consumption.
This supply of pure physical mechanical energy may theoretically be
tapped by interposing the spatial angular stability of a gyro
rotor/gimbal assembly, plus a transducer to convert the gyro/earth
mechanical energy and power into the desired type for ready utilization,
e.g., electrical, hydraulic, or other, between the onrushing inertial
rotational energy of the earth and the referenced spatial
stability--more accurately, rigidity (as in "brick wall" or Hoover
Dam)--of a gyro rotor and gimbal assembly.
In this invention, energy and power are derived from the inertial
(stored) energy of the angular rotational mass velocity of the earth,
the axis of which is coincident with the induced precessional reaction
torque supplied by the gyro rotor precession.
The motion of the earth is with respect to the unmoving angular space.
This invention to produce continuous, but intermittent, power output
without fuel or daily attention over long periods of
time--theoretically, eons.
Even the intermittency may be corrected, as in steam and IC engines, by
combining three or more unitary assemblies having sequentially phased
and overlapping power output strokes, or with electrical or inertial
energy storage during power strokes along with energy and power
conversion and withdrawal during re-precession periods.
Sufficient exploratory experimentation has been conducted to provide
confidence that the "Advanced Concept" will work "as advertised." For
example, it has been "manually" demonstrated on an experimental set-up
using a free gyro with a six-inch diameter rotor that with the
application of manual torque around two orthogonal axes, e.g., "polar"
and "equatorial" that, with all the torque that could manually be
applied to the two applied torque axes in opposition, the precession
around the third axis could be held motionless indefinitely.
It is entirely reasonable that the "manual" polar axis torque could be
replaced with earth rotational deceleration torque applied via a power
transducer input shaft as in the "normal" (free gyro) mode and the
"manual" equatorial axis torque could be replaced with a spring, a
torque motor, or a spring and trimming torque motor combination.
Thus, continuous, non-interrupted, non-intermitent power output could be
achieved by operating this invention in a "rate gyro mode" instead of a
"free gyro mode." United States Patent 5,313,850 - Finvold , et al. -
May 24, 1994 - Earth/gyro power transducer
--------------------
Now comes into play experiments holding a gyro (shaft of a spinning
bicycle wheel) by the late Eric Laithwaite and how it appeared to lose
weight AND follow a mysterious arc equivalent to the turn angle of DNA;
weight loss in a 50 pound spinning gyro;
http://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_5_9_5.html
I had typed that up about Aspdens DNA angle correlation and posted it on
the now defunct eScribe archive which of course no longer exists;
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m7392.html
As I recall, the angle was something like 32 degrees....as the spinning
gyro was lifted a series of stills were taken, then combined to plot the
arc and measure the angle degree...
Prompting Harold Aspden to suggest this angle as seen to in mechanical
rotation to match the natural incline of DNA, thus it might be a magic
angle useful for free energy and gravity control researchers.
I'll have to look all that up again and this time post it as a complete
page on KeelyNet along with this information, where it will always be
available for reference...
And finally, the discovery that the universe has a 'spin'...
http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mbhrotate.html
It's difficult to describe a celestial body's rotation in words. Even
terms like "clockwise" and "counterclockwise" or "right-handed" and
"left-handed" depend on your point of view. Suppose you have three
gyroscope wheels, one with its axis pointing north-south and spinning
counterclockwise as viewed from the north, one with axis pointing
east-west and spinning CCW as seen from the east, and one pointing
up-down and spinning CCW as seen from above. Which of the three is
spinning right-handed, and which is spinning left-handed?
Instead, let's assume that everything in the universe is screwed--that
is, rotating like a screw--and draw an arrow in the direction of rotation.
If you take all the bodies in the solar system, and draw arrows for both
their rotation and their orbital motion, you'll find that most of the
arrows point in more or less the same direction.
Coincidence? Not at all. Everything in the solar system formed from the
same cloud of material, and that cloud was spinning in some particular
direction, so it's natural that all of the planets that derived from it
would also spin in that direction.
However, as we start looking at ever-larger scales, we increasingly see
that space is isotropic, which is to say, there's no particular special
direction for anything, including rotation.
Things (including black holes) are rotating in every which way, unless
you're on a small enough scale, in which case it depends on where they
came from.
---------------------
According to the Japanese experiment below, we can think of screw
threads where threads rotating in the same direction yield no resistance
and are 'in phase'...versus threads rotating against each other by
varying degrees to produce resistance (phase conjugation) even to the
point of cancellation of motion (standing wave at 180 degrees out of phase).
So the Japanese experiment below indicates weight loss when a mass is
spinning CCW, therefore the spin of whatever (aether/zpe/gravity)
flowing into the earth must also be CCW to provide the least resistance
(gravity).
---------------------
and Bruce DePalmas dropped spinning ball experiment, however, I could
NOT FIND the direction of his spinning ball...according to the Japanese,
it will fall FASTER if spinning CW with respect to the earth and SLOWER
if spinning CCW;
http://www.rexresearch.com/depalma/depalma.htm
1) Experimental evidence supports the fact that a rapidly rotating
material object will gain in inertia.
2) The form of the gravitational interaction is that the additional
inertia property, od, of rapidly rotating real material objects,
represents an additional repository for the extraction and supplying of
work from or to a gravitational field. This means a rotating mass will
fall more rapidly (with greater acceleration) than a corresponding
no-rotating object under the influence of a gravitational field.
When we examine the behavior of the falling non-spinning object versus
the spinning object, we notice the spinning object falling faster (with
greater acceleration).
(I will BCC this to Andrew Mount, one of Bruce DePalmas closest
associates to see if he knows if the spin direction was recorded or
controlled.)
(As well, the decoupling to the aether/zpe/inertia due to vibration or
high velocity, would reduce its 'stickiness' to space...like velcro
hooks....as you slow down, more hooks rejoin to increase
inertia/weight...as you speed up, you rip the velcro couplings to reduce
inertia and maybe 'effective' weight.)
---------------------
As well, the drop test experiments using energized coils, not physical
rotation, of Don Kelly in Florida;
http://www.hasslberger.com/phy/phy_3.htm
---------------------
the sun and planets as precessing gyros;
http://www.sciam.com/askexpert_question.cfm?articleID=0002A1CE-3C3C-1C71-84A9809EC588EF21
In our own solar system, both the planets and our sun spin in the same
direction because they were formed from the same primordial cloud of gas
and dust.
(One of the exceptions to this general trend is Uranus, which may have
been knocked over onto its side by some titanic collision in its distant
past.)
The planets orbit the sun in the same direction in which the sun spins.
So, too, moons formed at the same time as their respective planets orbit
those planets in the same direction as the planet's spin.
---------------------
the Foucault Pendulum;
http://www.johndobson.org/articles/pendulum.html
Momentum is always half of something. And the Universe is "all dressed
up with no place to go." Because there is nothing with respect to which
it could have some momentum. Momentum, angular momentum and electric
charge are always half of something, and the other half, the opposite
half, is packaged in the Universe at large. And if you can watch the
great Foucault pendulum swinging in the hall at the science center or
the planetarium and not get goose bumps, it may just be that you're asleep.
---------------------
Japanese experiment;
http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/gyroag.htm
After spinning up the gyroscope to 18,000 revolutions per minute, it is
put inside an airtight container and allowed to fall between two laser
beams. These record how long the gyroscope takes to fall nearly 6ft
between the two beams. Any reduction in the strength of gravity reveals
itself in a slight increase in the time it takes to fall the 6ft.
In a series of 10 runs, the team found that the gyroscope took about
1/25,000 of a second longer to fall when it was spinning than when it
was stationary - equivalent to an anti-gravity effect of just one part
in 7,000.
And in a curious twist, the anti-gravity only appeared when the
gyroscope was spinning anticlockwise. The team members claim that both
this, and the size of the effect, are in line with earlier findings
published by them in 1989.
----------------
Universal repulsive force (aether/zpe pressure flowing into mass);
http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/push.htm
----------------
interesting side note about creating artificial gravity and dealing with
Coriolis forces;
http://www.ibiblio.org/astrobiology/index.php?page=scifi04
Going into the physics of this, there are two factors that are
interrelated in producing artificial gravity - the radius of the spin
and the rotation speed. The faster the rotation or the greater the
radius of the spin, the higher the gravity will be. Consequently, you
would imagine that you would not necessarily have to have a very large
space station (as Space Station Five is) to have Earth gravity - you
could just have a small space station (that is, one with a short radius)
and spin it faster.
Unfortunately this does not work in practice. When you spin an object
such as a space station, you create coriolis forces which is basically a
force that makes you want to travel in the direction of the spin - so
walking along the ring in the direction of the spin is fine, but if you
tried to walk sideways you would become dizzy. With a slow rotation of
the space station, coriolis effects are negligable and are not
noticeable, but as you increase the rotation movement becomes uncomfortable.
Studies have shown that rotations of 2 rpm and below can be tolerated by
humans relatively well - anything faster and you have serious problems
of dizziness. If you have a rotation of 2 rpm and want the equivalent of
Earth gravity on the outer space station ring, then the radius of the
space station will have to be approximately 223 metres long - and it
appears that Space Station Five has a radius roughly corresponding to
that, and a rotation roughly corresponding to 2 rpm, so it is completely
scientifically sound.
----------------
http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/kids_space/qearth_motion.html
The rotational speed of the Earth depends on where you are. At the
equator, the speed is about 1670 km/hr, or 1070 mi/hr.
To find the rotational speed where you live, take the cosine of your
latitude, and multiply it by the speed at the equator. For example, the
speed at a latitude of 60 degrees, the speed would be cos(60)x1670=835km/hr.
Does the Earth rotate around the Sun clockwise or anti-clockwise?
The Earth revolves around the Sun in a counter-clockwise direction.
Actually, all the planets in our Solar System revolve around the Sun in
the same direction.
What is the degree of the Earths axis?
The Earth's axis is tilted 24 degrees.
----------------
Screw threads, spin direction, phase conjugation, precession,...hmmmm...
--
Jerry Decker - http://www.keelynet.com
Donations to support KeelyNet: http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
Public Archive http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet
Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
