On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 11 June 2012 21:35, Scott Aron Bloom <scott.bl...@onshorecs.com> wrote: >> Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this… >> >> While in general I love the idea… In specific, I have had customers that are >> 5-10 years behind in their compiler choice.. >> >> Usually in the embedded world, where the processor doesn’t have a current >> version of gcc, but this does worry me that many people will be excluded >> from Qt 5.0 > > I think there's a misunderstanding: C++11 support IS NOT required to > use or build Qt 5. If you have a recent compiler and enable C++11 > support in Qt, then you get those nice extra features. Otherwise you > don't. But you can still use Qt 5 without them :) > > HTH, > -- > Giuseppe D'Angelo
Ahh, Ok. I can handle that. THanks for the clarification; Mike J. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
