Apologies for the double email, my client did something funcky. On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 14:22, G. P. B. <george.bany...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 14:15, Michael Voříšek - ČVUT FEL < > voris...@fel.cvut.cz> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> thank you for your comments, based on them, I fixed these: >> >> - usleep is now used as a fallback as well, if interrupted, remaining >> time is measured using microtime, so return value is always available >> >> - for BC, if not interrupted, return value remains to be 0 (integer >> zero) >> >> Now, the sleep() function should be really universal, cross platform and >> I would say also the prefered way to sleep. >> >> The implementaion is here https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/5961/files >> >> >> Please comment on Github directly if you have any feedback left. >> >> > I thinkit's worth considering if this also should be fixed in 8.0 or >> even earlier ;-)So good to hear the RM view on this. >> >> Sara, are you ok to include this in PHP 8.0 and do you require a RFC for >> it? >> >> With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / S přátelským pozdravem, >> >> Michael Voříšek >> > > Again, I personally don't understand why this could bypass the RFC process, as multiple people have already, me included, voiced their disagreement with this change. Secondly this change introduces another inconsistency, why can sleep accept a float but not usleep? If there is indeed a need for being able to specify a sleep in milliseconds I'd prefer the introduction of a msleep function then this change. Best regards George P. Banyard
