> Am 15.01.2024 um 11:57 schrieb Nicolas Grekas <nicolas.grekas+...@gmail.com>: > > Hi Daniil, > > I've opened voting for the final-by-default anonymous classes RFC: >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/final_by_default_anonymous_classes >> > > I voted against the proposal because as I mentioned in the previous thread > on the same topic, this is a backward compatibility break that lacks ground > but will have impact. > > Note that I voted even though I think the vote itself might be "illegal" > per our policies (neither did 6 months pass, nor does the proposal make > substantial changes to the previous one, to some definition of > "substantial"). If the vote itself isn't allowed per this policy, then my > vote is void of course. > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting#resurrecting_rejected_proposals > > Sorry for being a bit legalist on the topic but principles matter. We have > policies and this vote is on the edge of two of them. That's a red flag for > me. > > Nicolas
Hey Nicolas, I think having a radically different approach to this definitely qualifies as substantial. The previous RFC made final opt-in. This RFC proposes final by default and an opt-out, which is something a lot of voters suggested. Feel free to disagree, though I see here no grounds for disqualifying. This rule is here to not have repeated votes with cosmetic changes, to force a vote through. Bob
