On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 22:13 +0100, Lars Strojny wrote: > Hi, > > Am Samstag, den 26.01.2008, 12:17 -0500 schrieb Sam Barrow: > > I don't think throwing a E_NOTICE is appropriate. The isset() construct > > doesn't throw an E_NOTICE, this shouldn't either. > > As far as I understand it is just an extension to the already present > tertiary operator and therefore the ifsetor would be > isset($_GET['foo']) ?: 'bar'. I don't understand why that sugar should > act anything different and not trigger an E_NOTICE.
Yes, you're right. I misunderstood this to mean isset($foo) ? $foo : $default. I didn't realize that Sebastian was referring to the new shortcut for the ternary operator. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
