On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 14:08 -0500, Jeremy Privett wrote: > Sam Barrow wrote: > > I figured it out, the syntax is now as follows: > > > > function a($b, $c) returns d { > > } > > > > I'll post an update soon. > > > > > > > > That's certainly a non-intuitive syntax. How about we take a page out of > the book of other C-style languages before trying to invent something > else? I agree with Stas, "return" and "returns" are not part of a > function definition.
I don't think it's non-intuitive at all, and even so, it's the most intuitive we have. This ordering makes more sense to me at first glance (in the order I would think about things; scope, name, arguments, return). -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php