Hi, 2011/7/10 Nikita Popov <nikita....@googlemail.com>: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Lars Strojny <l...@strojny.net> wrote: >> >> Very good find of an inconsistency. Does the testsuite reveal something >> strange with that patch? > > > I didn't test that patch, just found it in the bugtracker. > cel...@php.net would be a better person to ask, as he wrote it. But > just from glancing at it I could imagine that it would break > token_get_all() as CG(active_class_entry) wouldn't be set > appropriately (though that's just a guess). >
Yes, you are right. We cannot rely on CG(active_class_entry) data. I'm against this patch, because we will just add more inconsistency. Allow reserved words in method name, OK. But what about class name/namespace name etc? And in the begin of thread the topic was type name as class name, nothing to do with methods. -- Regards, Felipe Pena -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
