On 18 July 2011 10:45, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Cowburn <petercowb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> My meaning was simply that trying to explain what was being voted on, >> after the vote has closed, is too late. I'm aware of the previous >> discussions on the topic on this list. > > It has been explained dozen of times before the votes, that's what I'm > trying to say :)
And the short description on the voting page (and associated non-voting page and the [VOTE] internals thread) made no mention of any such explanations for voters. That is what I'm trying to say. I may well be the only one who voted no due to not being 100% clear on what the vote entailed. I *assumed* the vote was to set MQ to off and leave the MQ functions as they are (even the set_magic_quotes_runtime() function) but without any link to sources of what "remove" really meant for that particular vote I was not comfortable with saying yes. In summary, link to the RFC(s) and/or internals discussion(s) next time please. > > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
