On Sun, May 20, 2012 5:44 pm, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Rafael Dohms > <lis...@rafaeldohms.com.br> wrote: >> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Anthony Ferrara >> <ircmax...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I had meant to reply to the list, but I had replied to Stas >>> directly. >>> I would be happy to change my vote from isset() and empty() to >>> empty() >>> only if that's what it would take... >>> >>> Anthony >> >> This would settle it, so in the realm of "action" what can we do >> now? >> Is there a rule that allows to call for a re-vote? >> Should start a new RFC? >> Or can we just alter the vote and consider this the "end of voting"? >> >> Sorry, but all this talking is running around in circles, and >> everything has been said. I would like to bring closure to this >> topic. > > See the previous mails, as long as other voters agree to change their > votes to empty only, we are done.
I had voted none. I really don't care about empty, because it has changed edge cases in every major release, so I can't use it. Therefore and herewith, I officially change my "none" vote to "empty only" Please put a fork in it and call it done. -- brain cancer update: http://richardlynch.blogspot.com/search/label/brain%20tumor Donate: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FS9NLTNEEKWBE -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
