On 28/02/2013 13:54, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > The major reason being is the lack of a stable, production ready op-code > cache. Am I crazy or APC not stable != a lack of a stable opcode cache. Whole discussion thread has been assuming people don't use anything and or there's nothing better than both ZO *and* APC - both facts being patently untrue. I hate to get adversarial about this stuff, but PHP seems to be suffering with a serious case of Not Invented Here syndrome at the moment.
Real world ZO isn't going to make people switch to PHP 5.5 and nothing but distro movement on this issue (around their release process) and good time are going to change that. It's always applied with PHP (and many other languages and projects) and it always will. Linux kernel is at 3.8.1 but Debian testing is shipping 3.2, because that's what the release process demands. Most sane people are going to use the PHP version their distro ships and most distros are going to ship what is tested, and not for nothing but bundling ZO if anything is going to gum up the works on that front because simply it's more code and features that will need testing and more config options to find sane defaults for. TL;DR - ZO isn't going to shift people. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
