__________________________________________________

Call for Publications

Theme: On the Challenge of Migration
Subtitle: Critical Hermeneutical Perspectives
Publication: Critical Hermeneutics. Biannual International Journal of
Philosophy
Date: Vol. 2, No. 1 (June 2018)
Deadline: 30.4.2018

__________________________________________________


The chronic Mediterranean refugee crisis brings to the fore how
difficult it is to manage large migratory flows and makes evident the
uneasiness with which Europe deals with the prospect of having to
host its others. Africa, Europe and the Middle East are troubled by
each other in ways that require urgent analysis and resolution.  This
apparent lack of solidarity even with asylum seekers and forced
migrants poses ethical, as well as political challenges. On the one
hand, it seems evident that the old Westphalian nation-state paradigm
is faced with its own limitations for dealing with problems of global
justice. On the other hand, international law is also in itself
insufficient, in the absence of coercive power. And one can also
argue that the response of the European Union has been lacking in
scope and effectiveness to deal with the humanitarian crisis. As
such, can the upholding of Human Rights still be considered an
integral part of Europe’s collective identity? At the same time, and
amid the resurgence of nationalism and the populist threat, are
European societies prepared to host “strangers” and really cherish
their diversity, or is a conservative backlash prone to lead to an
ever more hostile attitude?

This constellation of problems finds a suitable grid of analysis
within the critical hermeneutical paradigm. Following the footsteps
of authors such as Paul Ricoeur, Charles Taylor or Michael Walzer, to
name just a few, the goal is not to devise an ideal theory that draws
on abstract principles of justice; it is rather to apply the
hermeneutical paradigm to the social and human sciences, taking up
our historically constituted societies with their own specificities
in order to try and analyse justice problems and solutions in a
situated manner, while at the same time being critical and not taking
the current social and political situation as being immune to change.
The history of ideas of the lands, peoples and languages around the
Mediterranean can energise us with rich polysemy that is also
characterised by synergies (Plotinus, Neoplatonism, Al Kindi,
al-Farabi, Ibn Tufayl, Solomon Ibn Gabirol, Maimonides, Adonis and
many others). What can we learn, for example, from Sufism and its
troubles experienced at the hands of various fundamentalisms?

In this issue, we are thus interested in contributions that can stem
from a multiplicity of fields (ethics, political philosophy /
political theory, social philosophy, sociology, theology) and help us
think about migration and the problems it poses. Possible topics
include (but are not limited to):

- The capacity of our societies to embrace multiculturalism (Taylor,
  Kymlicka) and recognition practices (Honneth, Ricoeur, Taylor)
- The ethical challenge of hosting the stranger (Derrida, Ricoeur,
  Kearney)
- Migration as a challenge for social philosophy
- Migration and global justice
- Anti-immigration sentiments: the problem of nationalism and populism
- How to frame migration: the problem of collective narrative
  identities (Ricoeur)
- Polysemy of Mediterranean cultures (Plotinus, Adonis, Ibn Tufayl ,
  Maimonides)

Guest Editors:

Alison Scott-Baumann and Gonçalo Marcelo
goncalomarc...@gmail.com


Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to follow the Author Guidelines in preparing the
manuscript for submission. If necessary, the editors will exercise
the right to alter/modify manuscripts  in accordance with the
stylistic and formal lines of the journal. 

Submission of papers to Critical Hermeneutics is taken to imply that
the manuscript is not under consideration by other journals, and that
it is not a published work.  

This Journal follows a double-blind refereeing process for each
submission. The reviewers' evaluations determine whether a paper will
be accepted or rejected in accordance with four criteria: 1)
Excellent: the paper does not need any change; 2) Good: the paper
needs minor changes; 3) Interesting: the resubmission is recommended
after consistent changes and/or revisions; 4) Insufficient: the paper
is rejected. 

In case of resubmission (points 2 and 3), the same reviewers will be
charged to re-evaluate the paper.

The peer-review process, as the complete editorial workflow, is
managed within the Open Journal System (OJS) platform.

1. Language

The manuscript can be submitted in one of the following languages:
Italian, French, Spanish, German, Portuguese, or English (British or
American standard; not the mixture of both). All manuscripts will be
submitted (and possibly published) with two abstracts (maximum length
of 150 words for each one), one in English (British or American
standard) and one in the language of the manuscript. Keywords (from 3
to a maximum of 5) will be indicated accordingly.

Manuscripts with significant grammatical or syntactical
mistakes/problems will be immediately discarded without starting the
refereeing process.   

2. Length of paper 

The length of the paper should not exceed 50000 characters (spaces
included). Articles should be typed in 1,5 space, including footnotes
and references (placed at the end of the paper).  

3. First Page / Title Page

First Page / Title Page is a separated page before the text, which
starts with the abstracts. It must include the following information:
- Title
- Author(s)'s name(s) and affiliation(s)
- Telephone number and e-mail address

During the process of refereeing  this first page will be separated
from the rest. During the double-blind refereeing process the author
must not be recognised by the referees. The manuscript and the
reference must thus be suitable for blind review.

4. Subdivision of the article

It is highly recommended to clearly articulate the paper in numbered
and titled paragraphs/sections. Sections should be numbered 1, 2, 3,
etc. Internal subsections should be numbered 1.1., 1.2., 1.3., ...
2.1., 2.2., etc. 

5. Style

Authors should follow the latest APA style edition (see,
www.apastyle.org), which is the editing style followed by CH.  

6. References

Authors should arrange the references accordingly with the latest APA
style.

Deadline: April 30, 2018

For submissions please visit:
http://ojs.unica.it/index.php/ecch/about/submissions

Journal website:
http://ojs.unica.it/index.php/ecch/




__________________________________________________


InterPhil List Administration:
https://interphil.polylog.org

InterPhil List Archive:
https://www.mail-archive.com/interphil@list.polylog.org/

__________________________________________________

 

Reply via email to