Thanks for your comments.
Yes, George's draft is different from
the Mobile IPv4/v6 Interworking
proposal(draft-tsao-mobileip-duelstack-model-00.txt). However, these two drafts
can be used to solve some of the mobility problems in IPv6/IPv4
interworking. That is why I pose the related draft on the mailing list.
Regards,
Shiao-Li
----- Original Message -----
To: "Shiao-Li Charles Tsao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 5:10
PM
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Mobile IPv4/ Mobile
IPv6 Interworking Issues
>
> The IPv4/IPv6 interworking problems seems to involve both Mobile IP and
> IPv4/IPv6 transition issues. We also have a draft which is relevant to
> this topic.
>
> => George's draft (draft-tsirtsis-v4-over-mipv6-00.txt) is very different,
> he doesn't propose an integrated IPv4/IPv6 mobility but something very
> simple (ie. trivial :-) based on two remarks:
> - new mobile phone infrastructures will be based on IPv6 (mainly because
> the lack of addresses in IPv4)
> - mobile phones will be dual stack hosts (because this is the safe way
> and this is not too expensive)
> then a transition mechanism like DSTM which uses IPv4 over IPv6 tunnels
> will be able to use freely/transparently all IPv6 devices like mobile IPv6
> (I think George has EMA in mind but this applies too).
>
> Regards
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
