On 16.05.2013, at 1:25 AM, Lars Noschinski <nosch...@in.tum.de> wrote:

> @Alex, Gerwin: Is there any reason remaining why the AFP should not use the 
> default PolyML version?  I remember Alex and I dropped a similar override 
> from the Isabelle tests.

Not that I am aware of. The main reason there was an explicit version mention 
there was to keep track of what exactly was running and where it came from. We 
have a record of that now with the component system, so that can be dropped.

Cheers,
Gerwin

________________________________

The information in this e-mail may be confidential and subject to legal 
professional privilege and/or copyright. National ICT Australia Limited accepts 
no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments.
_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

Reply via email to