Tobias
On 07/11/2014 15:27, Dmitriy Traytel wrote:
This is in Isabelle2014. In 229765cc3414 I make the same measurements as Larry. So indeed (as the text above those lemmas suggests) there seems to be a regression with the simplifier setup. Dmitriy On 07.11.2014 15:10, Julian Brunner wrote:The proof that 97 is prime only takes 1.3s on my machine (2.7 GHz i7), with the whole theory Primes loading in about 4 seconds. On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Florian Haftmann <florian.haftm...@informatik.tu-muenchen.de> wrote:This theory takes quite a while to load, and I have found out why: text{* A bit of regression testing: *} lemma "prime(97::nat)" by simp lemma "prime(997::nat)" by eval The proof that 97 is prime takes 35 seconds on a very fast machine. Can we get rid of this or at least substitute a smaller number?The question is whether this has really to be performed using simp. As an alternative, a suitable code equations could be proven using the primes_upto in Eratosthenes.thy, but I did never take any measurements at which threshold the additional data structures outperform brute-force calculation. Florian -- PGP available: http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de _______________________________________________ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev_______________________________________________ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev_______________________________________________ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
