On a Wing and a Prayer By DEBRA BURLINGAME
December 6, 2006; Page A16
Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Those are the words
that started it all. Six bearded imams are said to have shouted them out while
offering evening prayers as they and 141 other passengers waited at the gate
for their flight out of Minneapolis International Airport. It was three days
before Thanksgiving. Allahu Akbar: God is great.
Initial media reports of the incident did not include the disturbing details
about what happened after they boarded US Airways flight 300, but the story
quickly went national with provocative headlines: "Six Muslims Ejected from US
Air Flight for Praying." Yes, they were praying -- but let's be clear about
this. The very last human sound on the cockpit voice recorder of United flight
93 before it screamed into the ground at 580 miles per hour is the sound of
male voices shouting "Allahu Akbar" in a moment of religious ecstasy.
They, too, were praying. The passengers and crew of flight 93 lost their
valiant fight to take back the plane just one hour and 20 minutes after it
pushed back from the gate. Until the hijackers stormed the cockpit door, they
were just a handful of Middle Eastern-looking men on their way to sunny
California. So, yes, let's be exceedingly clear about the whole matter. Some
3,000 men, women and children are dead because the unassuming people on those
airplanes did not look at them and see murderers. Or dangerous Arabs. Or
fanatical Muslims. They saw a few guys in chinos.
* * * In five years since the 9/11 attacks, U.S. commercial carriers have
transported approximately 2.9 billion domestic and international passengers. It
is a testament to the flying public, but, most of all, to the flight crews who
put those planes into the air and who daily devote themselves to the safety and
well-being of their passengers, that they have refused to succumb to ethnic
hatred, religious intolerance or irrational fear on those millions of flights.
But they have not forgotten the sight of a 200,000-pound aircraft slicing
through heavy steel and concrete as easily as a knife through butter. They
still remember the voices of men and women in the prime of their lives saying
final goodbyes, people who just moments earlier set down their coffee and
looked out the window to a beautiful new morning. Today, when travelers and
flight crews arrive at the airport, all the overheated rhetoric of the civil
rights absolutists, all the empty claims of government career
bureaucrats, all the disingenuous promises of the election-focused politicians
just fall away. They have families. They have responsibilities. To them, this
is not a game or a cause. This is real life.
Given that Islamic terrorists continue their obsession with turning airplanes
into weapons of mass destruction, it is nothing short of obscene that these six
religious leaders -- fresh from attending a conference of the North American
Imams Federation, featuring discussions on "Imams and Politics" and "Imams and
the Media" -- chose to turn that airport into a stage and that airplane into a
prop in the service of their need for grievance theater. The reality is, these
passengers endured a frightening three-and-a- half hour ordeal, which included
a front-to-back sweep of the aircraft with a bomb-sniffing dog, in order to
advance the provocative agenda of these imams in, of all the inappropriate
places after 9/11, U.S. airports.
"Allahu Akbar" was just the opening act. After boarding, they did not take
their assigned seats but dispersed to seats in the first row of first class, in
the midcabin exit rows and in the rear -- the exact configuration of the 9/11
execution teams. The head of the group, seated closest to the cockpit, and two
others asked for a seatbelt extension, kept on board for obese people. A heavy
metal buckle at the end of a long strap, it can easily be used as a lethal
weapon. The three men rolled them up and placed them on the floor under their
seats. And lest this entire incident be written off as simple cultural
ignorance, a frightened Arabic-speaking passenger pulled aside a crew member
and translated the imams' suspicious conversations, which included angry
denunciations of Americans, furious grumblings about U.S. foreign policy, Osama
Bin Laden and "killing Saddam."
Predictably, these imams and their attorneys now suggest that another
passenger who penned a frantic note of warning and slipped it to a flight
attendant was somehow a hysterical Islamophobe. Let us remember that but for
their performance at the gate this passenger might never have noticed these men
or their behavior on board, much less have the slightest clue as to their
religion or political passions. Of course, that was the point of the shouting.
According to the police report, yet another alarmed passenger who frequently
travels to the Middle East described a conversation with one of the imams. The
31-year-old Egyptian expressed fundamentalist Muslim views, and stated the he
would go to whatever measures necessary to obey all the tenets set out in the
Koran.
The activist Muslim American Society (MAS) issued a press release within
hours of the incident, demanding an apology and announcing a "pray-in" at
Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C. Standing just a short distance from
the Pentagon, where five years ago black plumes of smoke from the crash of
American Airlines flight 77 could be seen for miles, the assembled
demonstrators complained that African-American Muslims, accustomed to "driving
while black," must now cope with the injustice of "flying while Muslim." This
brazen two-step is racial politics at its worst; none of the imams are
African-American. MAS, which teaches an "Activist Training" program with
lessons on "how to talk to the media," must have been thrilled when one cable
news outfit, suckered by the rhetoric, compared the imams' conduct to that of
civil rights icon Rosa Parks, who refused to give up her bus seat in the face
of institutional racism. One wonders what the parents of the three 11-year-olds
who died on flight 77 -- all African-American kids on a National Geographic
field trip -- would make of this stunning comparison.
Today, MAS Executive Director Mahdi Bray says his organization wants more
than an apology. He wants to "hit [US Airways] where it hurts, the pocketbook,"
and, joined by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), will seek
compensation for the imams, civil and federal monetary sanctions, and new,
sweeping legislation that will extract even bigger penalties for airlines that
engage in "racial and religious profiling." An investigation by the Department
of Homeland Security's Office of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties is underway.
Not incidentally, it is the "fatwa department" of MAS that pushed for
segregated taxi lines that would permit Muslim cab drivers at the Minneapolis
airport to reject passengers carrying alcohol.
* * * Here's what the flying public needs to know about airplanes and civil
rights: Once your foot traverses the entranceway of a commercial airliner, you
are no longer in a democracy in which everyone gets a vote and minority rights
are affirmatively protected in furtherance of fuzzy, ever-shifting social
policy. Ultimately, the responsibility for your personal safety and security
rests on the shoulders of one person, the pilot in command. His primary job is
to safely transport you and your belongings from one place to another. Period.
This is the doctrine of "captain's authority." It has a longstanding history
and a statutory mandate, further strengthened after 9/11, which recognizes that
flight crews are our last line of defense between the kernel of a terrorist
plot and its lethal execution. The day we tell the captain of a commercial
airliner that he cannot remove a problem passenger unless he divines beyond
question what is in that passenger's head and heart is the day our commercial
aviation system begins to crumble. When a passenger's conduct is so disturbing
and disruptive that reasonable, ordinary people fear for their lives, the
captain must have the discretionary authority to respond without having to
consider equal protection or First Amendment standards about which even trained
lawyers with the clarity of hindsight might strongly disagree. The pilot in
command can't get it wrong. At 35,000 feet, when multiple events are rapidly
unfolding in real time, there is no room for error.
We have a new, inviolate aviation standard after 9/11, which requires that
the captain cannot take that airplane up so long as there are any unresolved
issues with respect to the security of his airplane. At altitude, the cockpit
door is barred and crews are instructed not to open them no matter what is
happening in the cabin behind them. This is an extremely challenging situation
for the men and women who fly those planes, one that those who write federal
aviation regulations and the people who agitate for more restrictions on a
captain's authority will never have to face themselves.
Likewise, flight attendants are confined in the back of the plane with
upwards of 200 people; they must be the eyes and ears, not just for the pilot
but for us all. They are not combat specialists, however, and to compel them to
ignore all but the most unambiguous cases of suspicious behavior is to further
enable terrorists who act in ways meant to defy easy categorization. As the
American Airlines flight attendants who literally jumped on "shoe bomber"
Richard Reid demonstrated, cabin crews are sharply attuned to unusual or
abnormal behavior and they must not be second-guessed, or hamstrung by
misguided notions of political correctness.
Ultimately, the most despicable aspect about the imams' behavior is that when
they pierced the normally quiet hum of a passenger waiting area with shouts of
"Allahu Akbar" and deliberately engaged in terrorist-associate d behavior that
was sure to trigger suspicion, they exploited the fear that began with the
Sept. 11 attacks. The imams, experienced travelers all, counted on the security
system established after 9/11 to kick in, and now they plan not only to benefit
financially from the proper operation of that system but to substantially
weaken it -- with help from the Saudi-endowed attorneys at CAIR.
US Airways is right to stand by its flight crew. It will be both dangerous
and disgraceful if the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of
Transportation and, ultimately, our federal courts allow aviation security
measures put in place after 9/11 to be cynically manipulated in the name of
civil rights.
Ms. Burlingame, a director of the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation, is
the sister of Charles F. "Chic" Burlingame III, the pilot of American Airlines
flight 77, which was crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.
URL for this article:
http://online. wsj.com/article/ SB11653635820264 1738.html
saiyed shahbazi
www.shahbazcenter.org
---------------------------------
Any questions? Get answers on any topic at Yahoo! Answers. Try it now.
