*Who wrote the Qur'an?*

Yusuf Toropov
yusuf.toro...@gmail.com

The non-Muslim's answer to this important question usually sounds like this:

"The Qur'an was authored by a human being; it is not a literal revelation
from God. It is a book created by human intelligence, like any other book.
It was, as a matter of historical fact, written by Muhammad, in the seventh
century A.D."


If this is your view, rest assured that you have plenty of company!

You should also know, though, that this point of view is not without its
difficulties. To believe it, you must also believe that Muhammad, peace be
upon him:

- Knew that the Earth and heavenly bodies were once a single point, and were
separated violently (21:30)

*What's more...*

- If you don't believe that he had access to special knowledge that made
possible this prefiguring of the modern Big Bang theory - a theory entirely
unknown to the Arabs of the seventh century - you must conclude that 21:30
of the Qur'an is merely an intriguing coincidence, a matter of getting
something right by chance.

Perhaps this passage is simply an intriguing coincidence. If it is, however,
it is not the only one.

This man, the supposed "author" of the Qur'an, would also have to have:

- Known about the relativity of time (22:47; 23:112 - 114; 70:4), a subject
similarly unknown to Arab tribes of this period.

Either he possessed some extraordinary source of knowledge allowing
discussion of this subject thirteen and a half centuries before Einstein, or
we are looking at another intriguing coincidence.

*Which is it?

*- Most non-Muslims will instinctively answer along these lines: " Even if
it means granting the text of the Qur'an a second striking coincidental
feature, the likeliest explanation is that both passages are merely examples
of happenstance."

*And yet:

*Consider that the same author would also have to have:

- Known that the universe is continuously expanding (51:47).

- Known that matter is created in pairs (36:36). (By the way, this discovery
earned the scientist Paul Dirac the Nobel Prize in 1933.)

- Known what modern biological science knows about the foundation of life on
Earth, namely that it is water-based (21:30).

- Known that iron is not native to the Earth, coming instead from an
extraterrestrial source (57:25).

- Known that the planet Earth travels in an orbit (27:88; 21:33).

- Known that the sun, too, moves in an orbit (37:38), as indeed modern
astronomy proves that it does.

- Known that the Earth's atmosphere acts like a protective shield for living
creatures (21:32).

- Known that the stages of human development in the womb unfold in a
specific, describable sequence (23:14) that has been confirmed by modern
experts in human embryology.

- Known that the roots of mountains extend deep into the earth and serve the
function of preventing shocks (21:31).

- Known details of how the Earth's rain cycle functions that were mysteries
to scientists until the twentieth century (30:48).

- Known what modern oceanographers have now learned, namely that bordering
seas meet but do not mingle with one another (55:19 - 20).

- Known that oceans have complex subsurface wave patterns (24:40).

- Known that, in communities of honeybees, only the females are workers
(16:68 - 69). (The Arabic verb forms can connect this reference to bees only
to female beings).

- Known, seven years ahead of time, that the humiliated Byzantine army of
his day would rejuvenate itself and secure a major victory, which in fact it
eventually did against the Persians (30:1 - 4).

- Known, two years before he did so, that he would enter Mecca in triumph
(48:27).

- Known that the body of the Pharaoh who had opposed Moses would be
preserved for future generations (10:91 - 92) - it is today on display in
the Royal Mummies Chamber of the Egyptian Museum.

- Known to refer (12:54) to the Egyptian head of state of Joseph's, peace be
upon him, era as king (Aziz-Malik) and not Pharaoh, the word that appears
erroneously in the book of Genesis.

- Known that the fabled Arabian lost city of Iram (89:6 - 8) whose
historical existence was confirmed by archaelogists only in 1990, was a
historical reality.

- Known that the ancient flood that had beset the southern Arabian people of
Saba from their dam system (34:15 - 17), similarly confirmed by modern
archaeology, was a historical reality.

- Known the name of Haman (28:38), a historical figure close to the Pharaoh
of the era of Moses, peace be upon him... despite the problems that a) the
name Haman does not appear in the Torah's version of the story, and b) the
ability to translate the hieroglyphic language system of the Egyptians had
been utterly lost for centuries at the time of the revelation of the Qur'an,
and indeed would remain lost until the year 1799. After the discovery in
that year of the Rosetta Stone, scholars were able to unlock the mystery of
the hieroglyphs and, eventually, to confirm that there was indeed a Haman,
unmentioned in the Hebrew scriptures, who was close to this Pharaoh in this
period, and who was involved in construction, just as the Qur'an says. If we
believe that human authorship is the only possible explanation for the
origin of the Qur'an, we must assume either that Muhammad, peace be upon
him, somehow had access to this information, or we must believe that this
passage is yet another in a remarkably long series of intriguing
coincidences.

*How many coincidences do we need to get the message?*

The message is simple: no human intelligence could have produced this book
in the seventh century.

Please know that there are many, many more such coincidences in the Qur'an.
I have listed here only those that do not require advanced knowledge in such
topics as Arabic, mathematics, Islamic history, or classical poetic forms.
Even with the brief list I have provided, there comes, I think, a point at
which one is obliged to evaluate the Qur'an's message carefully, closely,
and respectfully. These supposed coincidences are, I believe, clear signs to
humankind that the Qur'an's message is of a special quality, and must not be
ignored.

Only the repeated exposure of the individual human heart to the Qur'an's
message can settle such a momentous question, "Who wrote the Qur'an?"

If you are a person who believes that there is no such thing as a divinely
inspired revelation, the question is: how many coincidences does it take for
you to consider such a revelation to humanity may be possible?

If you are a person who believes that there is such a thing as a divinely
inspired revelation, the question is, how many coincidences are you willing
to ignore before considering the possibility that a particular text presents
such revelation?

Please know that I am NOT interested in any debate about the possibility
that any ONE of these verses I have cited is just a coincidence, or is for
some other reason unpersuasive to you.

The truly remarkable thing is that ALL of these features should present
themselves in a text supposedly composed by human intelligence - and the
profound unlikelihood of that is the astonishing coincidence we should
ponder.

Knowing what you now know about these supposed coincidences, do you honestly
believe that the Qur'an is simply the product of human intelligence, a book
like any other book? Or does it seem more likely to you that its message is
of a special quality?

Reply via email to