[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13408963#comment-13408963
 ] 

Stevo Slavic commented on DBUTILS-92:
-------------------------------------

Oh, right, that's why commons-lang and similar have added numbers to the 
package names in relocated releases.
I think though, unlike commons-lang, that it's much less likely that one would 
use one variant of dbutils directly and get the other one transitively.
Nevertheless, to stay on the safe side, probably better to follow the pattern 
and include in coordinates change also package change, and do that in a major 
(2.0) release.
                
> Align maven groupId with rest of the apache commons projects
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DBUTILS-92
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92
>             Project: Commons DbUtils
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: Stevo Slavic
>         Attachments: DBUTILS-92.patch, pom.xml
>
>
> It seems to be the trend (maybe there's even some convention/agreement among 
> Apache Commons developers) that with new releases Apache Commons projects use 
> org.apache.commons as Maven artifact groupId. Please consider aligning 
> commons-dbutils Maven artifacts groupId with this practice. If decided to use 
> org.apache.commons groupId, for the first release with new groupId also 
> consider publishing relocation pom file too with old groupId (see 
> [this|http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-relocation.html#Releasing_the_next_version]
>  for more info).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to