[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14709006#comment-14709006
 ] 

Dmitri Blinov commented on JEXL-177:
------------------------------------

Oh, thanks a lot, I have completely overlooked the possibility to use Classes 
instead of Objects for functors, though as is comes out it was documented even 
in 2.0

{code}
        funcs.put("fn177", fn177.class);
{code}

Nevertheless one problem keeps me unsatisfied, a *multiline* string literal, in 
the moment I'm using clumsy concatenations where string literals are intermixed 
with special *newline* variable, (which keeps string "\r" since we have none to 
insert it directly to literal), and the whole thing becomes a mess for 
relatively small XML fragment I'm trying to populate values with. It kind of 
works but in other languages like groovy, perl etc there is a notion of *String 
interpolation* syntax, and I believe its quite popular and in demand among 
users, so I thought if we have already had such a wonderful implementation of 
unified expressions it would be logical to have scripting and interpolation 
joined together in basic syntax.

Anyway, thanks for your effort.

> Unified expressions to be used in String literals in Jexl scripts
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JEXL-177
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-177
>             Project: Commons JEXL
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>            Reporter: Dmitri Blinov
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Introduce new string literals to jexl script that allow unified expressions 
> to be used, string literals could use for example triple quoted (single or 
> double) syntax for delimiters, may include newlines and should not escape 
> single quotes
> {code}
> user = "Bob"; server = "Test"; s = """Hello ${user}, welcome to ${server}"""; 
> return s;
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to