[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16061430#comment-16061430
]
Gilles commented on MATH-1422:
------------------------------
Generally speaking it has never been true; see those still open issues:
* MATH-740
* MATH-901
* MATH-1113
Those benchmarks were performed with homegrown micro-benchmark codes (see
{{PerfTestUtils}} class in the "test" part of the code repository).
It is a good idea to create benchmarks based on JMH. Contributions welcome.
> How accurate is FastMath javadoc?
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-1422
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1422
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Roman Leventov
>
> Javadoc to FastMath states that it is a "faster, more accurate alternative to
> java.lang.Math" since at least 2012:
> https://github.com/apache/commons-math/blob/696be68b5dc8872a818a24d8a377158314b54e31/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math3/util/FastMath.java
> How accurate is this assertion in 2017, Java 8?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
