[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17817916#comment-17817916
 ] 

Stefan Richter commented on FLINK-33555:
----------------------------------------

[~mapohl] I did some work related to local recovery (essentially using 
available local state in rescaling), but that doesn't affect allocation or 
non-rescaling scenarios.

> LocalRecoveryITCase.testRecoverLocallyFromProcessCrashWithWorkingDirectory:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-33555
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33555
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Tests
>    Affects Versions: 1.19.0, 1.20.0
>            Reporter: Matthias Pohl
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: test-stability
>         Attachments: FLINK-33555.log
>
>
> https://github.com/XComp/flink/actions/runs/6868936761/job/18680977238#step:12:13492
> {code}
> Error: 21:44:15 21:44:15.144 [ERROR]   
> LocalRecoveryITCase.testRecoverLocallyFromProcessCrashWithWorkingDirectory:119
>  [The task was deployed to AllocationID(fcf411eadbae8beed895a78ea1653046) but 
> it should have been deployed to 
> AllocationID(dec337d82b9d960004ffd73be8a2c5d5) for local recovery., The task 
> was deployed to AllocationID(a61fd8a6bc5ef9d467f32f918bdfb385) but it should 
> have been deployed to AllocationID(fcf411eadbae8beed895a78ea1653046) for 
> local recovery., The task was deployed to 
> AllocationID(dec337d82b9d960004ffd73be8a2c5d5) but it should have been 
> deployed to AllocationID(a61fd8a6bc5ef9d467f32f918bdfb385) for local 
> recovery.] ==> expected: <true> but was: <false>
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to