Guillaume Boué created SUREFIRE-1385:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: System properties defined in the Surefire and Failsafe 
plugin configuration should override user properties
                 Key: SUREFIRE-1385
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1385
             Project: Maven Surefire
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Maven Failsafe Plugin, Maven Surefire Plugin
    Affects Versions: 2.20
            Reporter: Guillaume Boué


Consider a build with the following POM configuration for the Maven Failsafe 
Plugin:

{code:xml}
<configuration>
  <systemPropertyVariables>
    <prop>foo</prop>
  </systemPropertyVariables>
</configuration>
{code}

When running the build with the command line {{mvn -Dprop=bar ...}}, the tests 
would be passed a system property with a value of {{bar}} instead of {{foo}}.

This is counter-intuitive since direct configuration of the plugin is overriden 
by the more general properties passed on the command line. I would have 
expected the closer definition in the POM to override the one passed with the 
CLI. Furthermore, in the case of the above sample, it would not be possible for 
the tests run by the Failsafe Plugin to have a system property {{prop}} with a 
value of {{foo}} if the build happens to already define a system property with 
the same name. While using a different name to avoid a clash is possible, it 
still doesn't make the test self-contained and consistent since anyone could 
run Maven with that other name and compromise the test that really relies on 
the system property having a value of {{foo}}.

The proposal is thus to make the {{systemPropertyVariables}} and 
{{systemPropertiesFile}} configuration elements of the Surefire and Failsafe 
Plugin take precedence over user properties passed on the command line.

Proposed commit 
[4de017b38b101b0b28f9fbed135eae3921b99d0d|http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven-surefire/commit/4de017b3]
 on SUREFIRE-1385 branch.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to