gnodet commented on issue #954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/issues/954#issuecomment-2067749362

   > Fully. So both m39 and m40 should require Java17. This is basically to 
simplify our own lives, and easier maintain. Maven4 is already Java17. If 
someone must have Java8 to build, should use Maven 3.9.x + smart builder.
   
   That's not the hard part to maintain.  The hard part is the DaemonMavenCli.  
If you really want to make a difference in term of maintenance, that's where 
things need to be fixed.
   People did contribute a bunch of PRs to make mvnd work the very same way 
than maven does, so that they can be used interchangeably, I'm not really sure 
we want to loose that for no real benefit.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to