[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17840780#comment-17840780
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on SUREFIRE-2010:
------------------------------------------
AlexShmydov commented on PR #476:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/476#issuecomment-2077093027
Hi all! Any news about this problem?
> Parameterized Selection Does not Work
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: SUREFIRE-2010
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-2010
> Project: Maven Surefire
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Junit 4.x support, JUnit 5.x support
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-M5
> Environment: Maven 3.6.3 and Ubuntu 20.04, but I suppose it happens
> everywhere
> Reporter: David Georg Reichelt
> Priority: Major
>
> In the current version (and also M6-SNAPSHOT), maven surefire is not capable
> of selecting parameterized tests based on the index. In
> [https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/single-test.html,]
> it is described that this should work by providing the index, e.g. using
> {code:java}
> -Dtest=MyTest#method[$INDEX]{code}
> or
> {code:java}
> -Dtest=MyTest#method[*]{code}
> for all.
>
> This happens both for JUnit 4 and JUnit 5.
> I created a mwe demonstrating this problem:
> [https://github.com/DaGeRe/parameterized-selection-demo]
> As far as I see it, the TestMethodFilter in
> [https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/master/surefire-providers/surefire-junit-platform/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/junitplatform/TestMethodFilter.java#L45]
> does the filtering, but has only a descriptor in the form:
>
> {code:java}
> [engine:junit-jupiter]/[class:de.dagere.peass.ExampleTest]/[test-template:test(int)]{code}
>
> So there is not the concrete value, but only the information that an int
> should be provided. Therefore, I currently see not any option to fix this
> easily or get this running using a regex pattern.
> Do I oversee something, or is it planned to fix this? If not, it would be
> better to update the documentation site accordingly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
