On Sunday 28 May 2006 12:32, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 11:32:31AM +0200, Daniel Danner wrote: > > Since I recently got a new mailbox, where subfolders are supported, I > > just wondered if mbsync is really incapable of synchronizing all > > folders recursively, or if I just did something wrong? > > if your mailbox uses a dot as a path separator, you can quite easily map > it to "flattened" mailbox names by changing > "LIST \"\" \"%s%%\"" > to > "LIST \"\" \"%s*\"" > in imap_list in drv_imap.c.
In which way will these "flattened" folders be put into the slave? And wont everything get confused when I try to push the "flattened" folders to the server again? > hierarchical syncing definitely does not work. That's really sad, will it be implemented soon/ever? I'd appreciate that at lot! Daniel ------------------------------------------------------- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
