Bruno,
1. Thanks for the advice. I removed the doctype declaration and it worked!
2. Only iText let us easily define our stucture 'easily' in xml. From your remark, does it mean that we may not have the support for this in days to come?
Regards,
Leena
bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leena Kulkarni wrote:
> Thanks Bruno for the reply.
>
> <>1. We have not written any Custom dtd/xsd. We were using the iText
> dtd and the tags mentioned in it. So we are using paragraphs, phrases,
> tables, rows, cells.. will all this code be useless now?
No, it will still work, but when you parse the XML,
don't validate it.
> 2. Can you give me more details of the book so that I can check if we
> have got it in library? any online link you have?
It's not published yet. It will be out in the fall of 2006.
What I meant was: parsing XML into PDF is not a bad idea,
but using the iText tags is probably not the way to go.
br,
Bruno
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
iText-questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions
Feel free to call! Free PC-to-PC calls. Low rates on PC-to-Phone. Get Yahoo! Messenger with Voice
