Hello,
I agree. Supporting more encoding types really helps extracting text. Currently
only text with ToUnicode section in the corresponding fonts can be extracted.
WMJ
>________________________________
>
>
>Hi Kevin,
>
>Not to hijack this thread, but what I'd like to do see is to have support for
>more encoding types. For example the attached document produces no output
>using any extraction startegy (I tried with 5.1.2).
>
>Thanks.
>Daniel
>
>On 2011.11.15. 14:26, Kevin Day wrote:
>>
>> WMJ wrote:
>>>
>>> The parser is not very powerful or convenient yet, but it does point you
>>> to the most detailed part of the PDF text.
>>>
>>
>> WMJ - what would you see as enhancements that would make it more powerful or
>> convenient? Understanding the details of this will help us improve.
>> Thanks.
>>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
iText-questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions
iText(R) is a registered trademark of 1T3XT BVBA.
Many questions posted to this list can (and will) be answered with a reference
to the iText book: http://www.itextpdf.com/book/
Please check the keywords list before you ask for examples:
http://itextpdf.com/themes/keywords.php
