Paulo,
Paulo Soares-3 wrote: > The signature code is being revised, the existing code can be confusing. > I'm still not sure what the end result will be be the general idea is to > have a simple, no questions asked, way of signing and an external > signature way of signing where signature dictionaries can be created to > fit other needs. This will break existing code but now that iText 5 is > fresh is the right time to do it. Would input on this be appreciated? Or do you already have designed the finale architecture? Regards, Michael. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-sign-examples-tp26886381p26948731.html Sent from the iText - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://www.1t3xt.com/docs/book.php Check the site with examples before you ask questions: http://www.1t3xt.info/examples/ You can also search the keywords list: http://1t3xt.info/tutorials/keywords/
