Paulo Soares-3 wrote > Unless Foxit fixes it, they will have to complain to Microsoft.
Well, at least they should say what they require in a CMS signature container to accept it. If they indeed require the ESS signing-vertificate[-v2] for security and stated that in a verification failure message, everything would be in best order. Unfortunately there is nothing like that in the message, nor is there anything in their Foxit Reader manual. > That particular example was using smartcard signing and everything is done > by the Windows CAPI. > I'm sure you can add data to use as signed attributes there, too. In that case Windows CAPI is very likely to add the MessageDigest attribute automatically. Regards, Michael -- View this message in context: http://itext-general.2136553.n4.nabble.com/Re-Digital-sigantures-generated-with-itext-are-not-valid-in-Foxit-tp4299281p4299939.html Sent from the iText - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Mar 27 - Feb 2 Save $400 by Jan. 27 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions iText(R) is a registered trademark of 1T3XT BVBA. Many questions posted to this list can (and will) be answered with a reference to the iText book: http://www.itextpdf.com/book/ Please check the keywords list before you ask for examples: http://itextpdf.com/themes/keywords.php
