On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Hans Verkuil wrote: >Keep in mind that we want to get rid of these separately maintained >modules anyway, so I would suggest to see if we cannot just copy the >video4linux sources instead. The latest cvs versions have all the >missing tuners in, so there is no reason left to keep our own version. > >I'm trying to do the same with tveeprom right now. So if you could do >that with the tuner module and tda9887 then that would help a lot. Any >improvements over the video4linux sources should go there, not here. >That includes changes to make it compile for 2.4, BTW. I asked and >although the 2.4 support is currently broken, they think it should be >fixed.
2.4 support looks... problematic. I'm not set up for multiple build trees, but I've wrangled the v4l tuner into ivtv with only a few changes to headers. The only thing I can see obviously missing for 2.4 are the MODULE_PARM entries. Once I've got tda9887 in a similar shape, and assuming it still works on my PVR-150, I'll post it somewhere where hopefully people who want 2.4 support can provide feedback. BTW, do you have a link for the abovementioned video4linux-list 2.4 thread? If the breakage is small I can certainly try to fix #defines and Makefiles. Familiarity with kernel/v4l/i2c API changes is not my forte, however. Cheers, Phil ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
