Lucas Meijer wrote:
> Graeme Wilford wrote:
> 
>> Use the ivtv_dynbuf=0 driver option as mentioned below.
>>
>> Should we perhaps change the *default* to static buffer allocation?
>> This problem appears to crop up time and again...
> 
> 
> Sounds like a good idea to me. I've not used the .3 series for months
> and months because of freezups I didn't know how to get rid of, untill
> recently a kind soul here suggested the ivtv_dynbuf=0 setting.

IIRC, the dynamic buffer alocation is preferable if you are loading the
newer firmware.

-Tyler


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel

Reply via email to