Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Christoph Toshok]
> > I was under the impression that jnitypes.h was built by the
> > configure script. Is this not the case?
>
> Yes, it is. The real problem, which I discovered later on, is that
> jnitypes.h is rebuilt every time configure changes, even if there are
> no changes. Unlike include/config.h, which is diff'ed before it is
> replaced with a new version.
>
oh, hrm. I presume there's special logic for the AC_CONFIG_HEADER
macro, while jnitypes.h is built as part of the AC_OUTPUT macro...
>
> > Is that "nasty bug" affecting javac you listed as fixed in the NEWS
> > file the same one Brian Jones reported? Because if it is, it
> > doesn't seem to be fixed for me.
>
> You mean the random letter and dot string in bogus compiler error?
> 'Class java.lll.lll.lll not found' is still there. I have no clue
> why or where it fails.
Hmm. If someone can give me a smallish test case (i'm sure there's been
one mentioned before... i just can't find it :), I'll take a look at
this.
xtoph
