Thanks very much for your feedback!
Regards
Marie-odile
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De: Nissim Karpenstein [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Date: mercredi 25 août 1999 17:22
> À: Java-Servlets
> Objet: Re: Passing Session to JSSI included servlets
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to do, but I just noticed
> that at the top of ServletTagHandler.java there's a comment that says
> this:
>
>
> /* TODO:
> * (from Tim Williams, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:)
> * - Support "CODEBASE" servlet tag, allowing remote loading of servlets
> * - Make "NAME" parameter work for symbolic names, not just "CODE"
> * - Integrate functionality with James' modifications
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> */
>
>
> So I guess CODEBASE isn't supported yet.
>
> -Nissim
>
>
> "Marche, Marie-Odile" wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > Here is a little mail concerning a slightly different subject than
> session
> > and JSSI (although it is certainly very useful, but I don't use the
> Session
> > object yet).
> >
> > You seem to be very much involved in the JSSI development, so I take
> this
> > opportunity to ask you a very specific question about the <servlet> tag:
> > - is it possible to specify a target servlet zone inside this
> tag (I
> > want to call a servlet which exists in several servlet zones and would
> like
> > to be able to give the servlet zone in addition to the servlet path
> > -> is there a way to do this?
> > Another JSSI user advised me to use the "CODEBASE" attribute of the
> SERVLET
> > tag , but it gave me no result.
> >
> > Thanks for your attention,
> >
> > Marie-odile, France.
> >
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De: Nissim Karpenstein [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Date: mardi 24 août 1999 23:03
> > > À: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Objet: Passing Session to JSSI included servlets
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I want to add a feature to JSSI, and I want to know if it's a bad
> idea.
> > > I want to be able to access the session from a servlet that's called
> > > through the <SERVLET> tag. I've found that since the SSI servlet
> > > already wrote output to the response, request.getSession() always
> > > returns a new session in such servlets.
> > >
> > > Here's my idea for a solution...please comment.
> > >
> > > I was thinking that we can have the SSI servlet get the Session before
> > > writing any output. Then, when calling a servlet from the <SERVLET>
> tag
> > > it can check (through reflection) if there's a method
> > > service(ServletRequest, ServletResponse, HttpSession), and if there
> is,
> > > call that, and pass it the session, otherwise, call the standard
> > > service() method. It could also be done by making an abstract class
> > > which extends GenericServlet, and has the additional method, and then
> we
> > > can check with instanceOf rather than using reflection.
> > >
> > > Let me know if this is an OK idea as I will implement it.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > -Nissim
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
