Database implementation of the index is always bound to be slow compared to storing it on the filesystem.
Probably the group which stores indexes into Berkley DB should be able to give you a performance measuer of what will happen you store indexex in databases. Rgds Prabhu On 4/8/06, Marios Skounakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > I recently came across the Compass Framework, which is built on top of > lucene. I > am interested in it because it stores the lucene index in an RDBMS and > provides > transaction support for index updates (it also has several other features > but > this is the part I'm mostly interested in). > > I wanted to know if any people here have had any experience with compass > and what > they think about it. Is the database implementation of the index fast > enough and > does it introduce any additional issues/problems? > > Thanks in advance, > Marios > ---- Msg sent via eXis webmail > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
