Thanks Mikhail Could you describe your sentences in more detail?
Vadim On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello, Vadim. > > Please find inline. > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Vadim Gindin <vgin...@detectum.com> > wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > As I can understand. All Queries (or most of them?) are single-field > > oriented. They may implement different search/score logic, but they are > > intended for a single field. For example, simple TermQuery or > PhraseQuery. > > If I need to implement the search through different fields I should use > > BooleanQuery to combine several single-field queries. > > > > Did I understand that right? > > > > Absolutely > > > > > > What is an appropriate way to implement a document-wise Query? > > > > 1. DisjunctionScorer.getChildren() painful doc-at-time handling > 2. there is a quite promising idea is to amend buffer in term-at-time > BooleanScorer to track every doc-term hit. > 3. probably it can be done by copying all terms into single field, but > storing original field in payloads, but it's reaalllly slooooww > > > > I need to have the ability to combine fields matching of one document and > > analyze it. Particularly - to count whether all query terms are matched > (to > > one field or to different fields). I need to be able to fetch > corresponding > > information: what terms are matched to what fields and so on. > > > > > > It seems, that BooleanQuery/BooleanScorer is not a good place to > accumulate > > some information from a child Queries/Scorers. > > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev >
