Me too ;-) No objections against depending on jetty ;-) CGJ
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. April 2002 06:15 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] Old servlet.jar vs. jboss.net/jetty dependency? Yes. We shoould not even include the sun provided binary since we are building this from source. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frederick N. Brier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:36 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] Old servlet.jar vs. jboss.net/jetty dependency? > I need to use the class javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper > for the Flash/Axis servlet, but it can't be found in servlet.jar. > Looking closer, I noticed that the build.xml for JBoss.net is > referencing a servlet.jar in jboss-all/thirdparty/sun/servlet/lib. > The files in the archive are dated 7/11/2000. The actual archive in > the JBoss distribution is javax.servlet.jar which is a superset of the > older archive, has the current build date, and the required file. The > problem is that the javax.servlet.jar is built in the > jboss-all/jetty/output/lib directory. So > this would require modifying the root build.xml file to make the > _module-jboss.net-most dependent on _module-jetty-most, and then > modifying the build.xml [lines 91-94] in jboss-all/jboss.net to > specify the javax.servlet.jar in the jetty output directory. Is this > reasonable? Thank you. > > > > > Frederick N. Brier > Sr. Software Engineer > Multideck Corporation _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
