Hi,
I have a @Remote & @Local interface
| @Remote
| @Local
| public interface IMyIfc { ... }
|
SLSB that implements the interface
| @Stateless
| public class MyClass implements MyIfc { ... }
|
and another SLSB where MyClass is injected
| @Stateless
| public class AnotherClass implements IAnotherIfc {
| @EJB
| IMyIfc myIfc;
|
| ...
| }
|
I would expect that local proxy is injected into AnotherClass.myIfc, however
EJB container injects remote proxy. My question is - what is the reason for
preferring remote over local? I did not find anything about this issue in
spec... I suggest changing the order, so that call-by-reference behaviour is
preferred to call-by-value.
Thanks,
Petr
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954299#3954299
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954299
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user