Paul Kinnucan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Update of /pack/anoncvs/jde/lisp > > In directory sunsite.dk:/tmp/cvs-serv11659 > > > > Modified Files: > > jde-xref.el > > Log Message: > > Made jde-xref-store-prefixes non-optional. I think if we didn't do > > this, most people would leave it blank, therefore significantly > > impacting both size of the database and the time and memory it takes > > to make it. > > > > Hi Andy, > > How about making nil default to the package of the class in the > current source buffer?
I'm not sure I want to make any assumptions. Typically, people would want their database to encompass more than one package. Plus, I anticipate that this will not always be invoked from a Java buffer. For instance, you could rebuild the database every night, and in that case you wouldn't be in a buffer. > > Also, I'd like to suggest renaming jde-xref-store-prefixes to > jde-xref-packages as that more clearly indicates the variables > purpose. > Let me think about this one. The thing is, the variable doesn't contain package names, it contains package prefixes. But the name is a bit confusing, I agree. > - Paul
