2008/5/22 Maciek Niedzielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sander Devrieze wrote: >> >> 2008/5/22 Daniel Henninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> xmpp >>> >>> Since such a thing does exist. =) I'm actually also using gtalk, but I >>> don't really think that ought to be officially registered. *shrug* =) >> >> Yes, why do you actually have such a transport? AFAICS this only can >> confuse people, or am I wrong and are there good reasons to have it? > > That's for poor clients like Coccinella that doesn't support multiple > accounts ;)
No, that's not what I mean. The Openfire Gateway thing includes a separate transport instance for Google Talk, besides XMPP. So people see in the list "XMPP Transport" *and* "Google Talk Transport". I don't see why it is useful to have this kind of duplication...but maybe there is a reason for that? -- Mvg, Sander Devrieze.
